Vs: Faceliftin takavalojen kelpaaminen katsastuksessa?
Kyselly oon jo tuolta ozvr4 foorumilta ja ei siellä E-hyväksyntää ole.
Löysin kyllä jo suomiautosta luukun, puskurin ja toisen takavalon kohtuu hintaan että siinä taitaa olla se helpompi reitti.
Vielä kun löytää uupuvan takavalon ja eteen tarvittavat hilppeet niin sitten olis osien puolesta tarvittavat kasassa.
Alla on tuolta kyselystäni katkelmia.
______________________________________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by xlh82 View Post
It's approval of European Commission (EC)
Any lens need an E-approval stamp moulded into the plastic/ glass (it's a capital-E in a circle followed by some numbers).
Had a look for you. There is no E mark. I am familiar with the mark you mean.It says on the back Koito 53-08305 JAPAN L or R depending on which side you look at, left or right. Definitely no E mark.
In England to get a grey import road legal without a "model report" which the Legnum does not have, it needs to be over 10 years old. Only a few facelifts are that old now. I'd guess that something similar might be happening in Finland, especially if the legnums you see are coming via England.
__________________________________________________
Well I am in New Zealand, but from many years hanging out on www.clubvr4.co.uk I know that the UK new facelift galant estate (ie. Legnum) had a facelift front, but pre-facelift rear just like the car in your link. My understanding is that the facelift legnum rear was never approved due to pedestrian safety considerations - it is too pointy and might skewer a person! Not having E-mark lights may also be a consideration. Anyway a prefacelift rear easily bolts onto a facelift legnum and you ought to be able to find one cheap enough if necessary. If you cannot find it locally, you can find 2nd hand dealers in the UK, New Zealand or Japan who will be able to supply a prefacelift rear easily enough. I do not actually know if Japanese pre-facelifts have an E-mark lights - you will need to ask elsewhere for that, though one assumes that they must.
___________________________________________________
Getting back to the topic... I tried to take a photo of what could be the markings that you are after, but I couldn't get a clear picture.
There is a circle with 2 lines through it... not quite an E within a circle.
So it is similar to this:
O R-1828